top of page

You can find us here

  • Vimeo
  • LinkedIn
  • Youtube

Contact

Risk assessment in accordance with BRC, ISO 9001, HACCP standards

  • Writer: Aleksandra Burczyk
    Aleksandra Burczyk
  • Feb 11
  • 3 min read

In today’s dynamic world of food production and quality management, risk assessment has become not only a standards requirement but also one of the most important tools for preventing problems before they arise. Whether we refer to BRC, ISO 9001, or the HACCP system – a risk-based approach is their common foundation. But what does this actually mean in practice?


Risk – Not an Enemy, but a Guide

In quality management, risk does not necessarily mean disaster. On the contrary, it is a tool that allows organizations to better understand processes, anticipate potential threats, and manage them effectively. Risk assessment not only protects a company from losses but also uncovers opportunities for improvement and innovation.


Risk Assessment According to BRC (British Retail Consortium)

The BRC standard (currently BRCGS – Brand Reputation Compliance Global Standard) places particular emphasis on hazard and risk analysis, especially in the context of food safety.

Key points:

  • Risk assessment applies to all processes affecting product quality and safety.

  • A documented risk assessment methodology is required – e.g., a risk matrix or scoring scale.

  • BRC requires continuous updates of risk analysis – for example, after changes in recipe, supplier, or technology.

In practice, a production facility operating in accordance with BRC analyzes every link in the production chain – from raw materials to finished products – for microbiological, physical, chemical hazards, and food fraud risks.


ISO 9001 – Quality Management Through a Risk Lens

The ISO 9001:2015 standard introduced the concept of risk-based thinking. Unlike earlier editions, it does not impose a specific method of analysis – it provides flexibility.

What ISO 9001 emphasizes:

  • Risk should be identified at every stage of the business process – from strategic planning to customer service.

  • The organization must determine risks and opportunities that may affect its ability to achieve intended results.

  • The focus is not only on “threats,” but also on development opportunities identified through risk analysis.

In the context of ISO 9001, a well-conducted risk assessment is not only a protective measure but also a way to build competitive advantage.


HACCP – The Classic Risk-Based Food Safety System

HACCP (Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points) is a pioneer of the risk-based approach. Its foundation lies in identifying hazards, assessing their significance, and determining Critical Control Points (CCPs).

The 7 Principles of HACCP:

  1. Conduct a hazard analysis.

  2. Determine Critical Control Points (CCPs).

  3. Establish critical limits.

  4. Monitor CCPs.

  5. Establish corrective actions.

  6. Establish verification procedures.

  7. Establish documentation and record-keeping.

HACCP focuses primarily on food safety, but its principles are so universal that they often integrate with ISO- and BRC-based quality systems.


Risk Assessment in Practice – How to Do It Effectively

Regardless of the standard, risk assessment should be based on several foundations:

  • Hazard identification – What could go wrong?

  • Probability assessment – How often could it happen?

  • Impact analysis – How serious would the consequences be?

  • Preventive actions – How can we reduce the risk?

  • Monitoring and review – How do we ensure everything works effectively?


Practical tools worth using:

  • Risk matrices

  • FMEA (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis)

  • Ishikawa (cause-and-effect) diagrams

  • Checklists and internal audits


Summary

In a world where consumer trust and brand reputation can collapse due to a single defective batch, risk assessment is not a choice – it is a necessity. Standards such as BRC, ISO 9001, and HACCP demonstrate that only a conscious and systematic approach to risk ensures real safety and sustainable growth.

It is worth remembering: risk assessment is not bureaucracy – it is an investment in quality, safety, and business stability.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page